Czech Sociological Review 1999, 7(1):3-22 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.1999.35.11.01

A General Interpretation of Transition in the Czech Republic (1989-1993)

Jiří Kabele
Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague

Published: March 1, 1999  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kabele, J. (1999). A General Interpretation of Transition in the Czech Republic (1989-1993). Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review35(1), 3-22. doi: 10.13060/00380288.1999.35.11.01
Download citation

References

  1. Arendt, H. 1965. On Revolution. New York: The Viking Press.
  2. Bayer, I., J. Kabele 1996. "Politische Kultur der Tschechische Republik und ihre Transformation." Köln: Bundesinstitut für Ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien. Band 40.
  3. Benáček, V., M. Středová, M. Šlaisová 1998. "Problémy (české) byrokracie z pohledu ekonomie" (The Problems of Czech Bureaucracy from the View of Economy). Praha: Institut ekonomických studií FSV UK (manuscript prepared for print).
  4. Coleman, J. 1990. The Foundation of Social Theory. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  5. Crozier, M. 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  6. Dahrendorf, R. 1988. The Modern Social Conflict. Los Angeles: University of California Press, Berkeley.
  7. Dahrendorf, R. 1991. Úvahy o revoluci v Evropě (Reflections on the Revolution in Europe). Praha: Evropský literární kruh.
  8. Dvořáková, V., J. Kunc 1994. O přechodech k demokracii (About Transitions to Democracy). Praha: SLON.
  9. Durkheim, E. 1957. Suicide. New York: The Free Press.
  10. Furet, F. 1994. Promýšlet francouzskou revoluci (Panser la Révolution francaise). Praha: Atlantis.
  11. Greimas, A. 1966. Sémantique structurale. Recherche de méthode. Paris: Librairie Larousse.
  12. Havelka, M. 1997. "The Czech Transformation - The Universal and the Particular." Czech Sociological Review 5: 73-79. Go to original source...
  13. Illner, M. 1996. "Post-Communist Transformation Revisited." Czech Sociological Review 4: 157171. Go to original source...
  14. Kabele, J. 1992. "Československo na cestě od kapitalismu ke kapitalismu" (Czechoslovakia under the Way from Capitalism to Capitalism). Sociologický časopis 28: 4-21.
  15. Kabele, J. 1993a. "Východoevropské převlékání kabátů" (East European Coat-Turning). S-obzor 2: 3-7.
  16. Kabele, J. 1993b. "The Dynamics of Social Problems and Czechoslovak Transition." Social Research 60: 763-787.
  17. Kabele, J. 1994. "Mýtus, realita a transformace" (Myth, Reality and Transformation). Sociologický časopis 30: 21-35.
  18. Kabele, J. 1997. "Rejection of Holistic Social Engineering, Ethics and Transition." Pp. 20-42 in Business Ethics in East Central Europe, ed. by P. Koslowski. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Go to original source...
  19. Kabele, J. 1998a. "Transition or Transformation." S. 11-24 in Eliten, politishce Kultur, und Privatisierung in Ostdeutschland, Tshechien und Mittelosteuropa, hrsg. von I. Srubar. Konstanz: UVK Konstanz.
  20. Kabele, J. 1998b. Přerody: principy sociálního konstruování (Transitions: The Construction of Transitions). Praha: Karolinum.
  21. Linz, S. 1974. Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  22. Machonin, P. 1996. "Modernisation and Social Transformation in the Czech Republic." Czech Sociological Review 4: 171-187. Go to original source...
  23. Machonin, P., M. Tuček, et al. 1996. Česká společnost v transformaci (Czech Society in Transformation). Praha: SLON.
  24. Marada, R. 1997. "Civil Society: Adventures of the Concept before and after 1989." Czech Sociological Review 5: 3-23. Go to original source...
  25. Mertlík, P. 1993. "Institutional Change: Some Czech Lessons." EAEPE 1993 Conference "The Economy of the Future: Ecology, Technology, Institutions". Palace of Congress, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 29-30 October.
  26. Možný, I. 1991. Proč tak snadno… (Why so easy&hellip). Praha: SLON.
  27. Popper, K. 1950. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  28. Przeworski, A. 1992. Democracy and the Market. Political and the Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  29. Ricoeur, P. 1986. Time and Narrative (Vol. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  30. Schmitter, P. C. 1994. "Transitology and Consolidology: Proto-Sciences of Democratization?" Paper for publication by the Latin American program of the Woodrow Wilson International Center.
  31. Srubar, I. 1994. "Variants of the Transformation Process in Central Europe. A Comparative Assessment." Zeitschrift für Soziologie 23: 198-221. Go to original source...
  32. Stark, D. 1992. "The 'Great Transformation'. Social Change in Eastern Europe." Contemporary Sociology 21: 299-304. Go to original source...
  33. Stark, D. 1996. "Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism." American Journal of Sociology 101: 993-1027. Go to original source...
  34. Szelényi, S., I. Szelényi, R. Poster 1996. "Interests and Symbols in Post-Communist Political Culture: The Case of Hungary." American Sociological Review 61: 466-477. Go to original source...
  35. Sztompka, P. 1996. "Pohled zpět: Rok 1989 jako kulturní a civilizační zlom" (Looking Back: The Year 1989 As a Cultural and Civilizational Break). Sociologický časopis 32: 5-21. Go to original source...
  36. Šiklová, J. 1990. "The 'Gray Zone' and the Future of Dissidents." Social Research 57: 347-363.
  37. Večerník, J. 1996. Markets and People. Aldershot: Avebury.
  38. Zapf, W. 1991. "Der Untergang der DDR und die soziologische Theorie der Modernisierung." S. 38-51 in Experiment Vereinigung, hrsg. von B. Giesen, C. Leggewie. Berlin.
  39. Zapf, W. 1993. "Die DDR 1989/1990 - Zussammenbruch einer Sozialstruktur?" S. 29-48 in Der Zussamnenbruch der DDR, hrsg. von H. Joas, M. Kohli. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.