Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2010, 46(3): 349-374 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2010.46.3.02

Private Rental Housing in the Czech Republic: Growth and…?

Martin Lux, Petr Sunega
Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague

The goal of this article is to describe the development of private rental housing after 1990 in the Czech Republic and especially to demonstrate the significance of state regulations on people's expectations, social norms, and thus the form of housing systems emerging in transition countries. The argument of this article is that state interventions affecting property restitution, the protection of tenants, rent regulation, and the relative subsidisation of individual housing tenures are crucial factors infl uencing the perception and significance of private renting in the Czech Republic. At the beginning of the transition there was a universe of options: the private rental sector could evolve into a stable and significant tenure or into a weak, volatile, and residual type of housing. The particular rules of the game - state regulations - led to the quick supply of new private rental dwellings, but at the same time they substantially constrained the long-term demand for this type of housing. Like in those advanced countries where a more dramatic form of private rental housing liberalisation occurred, in the Czech Republic the significance of rental housing quickly shifted to become a temporary and residual form of housing. This article is thus about the 'greenfield' establishment of a housing system and how initial state regulations create or modify the long-term social norms relating to housing tenures and especially to private rental housing tenure.

Keywords: Czech Republic, housing system, private rental housing, transition economies, housing theory

Published: June 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lux, M., & Sunega, P. (2010). Private Rental Housing in the Czech Republic: Growth and…? Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 46(3), 349-374. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2010.46.3.02
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Arnott, R. 1995. 'Time for Revisionism on Rent Control?' Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 99-120. Go to original source...
    2. Barlow, J. and S. Duncan. 1994. Success and Failure in Housing Provision. European Systems Compared. Oxford: Pergamon.
    3. Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: a Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
    4. Boelhouwer, P. J. and H. M. H. van der Heijden. 1992. Housing Systems in Europe. Delft: Delft University Press.
    5. Boelhouwer, P. J. and H. M. H. van der Heijden. 1993. 'Housing Policy in Seven European Countries: the Role of Politics in Housing.' Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 8: 383-404. Go to original source...
    6. Donner, C. 2000. Housing Policies in the European Union. Vienna: s.n.
    7. Donner, C. 2006. Housing Policies in Central Eastern Europe. Vienna: s.n.
    8. Dübel, A. 2003. Housing Policy in Central European Countries in Transition. Vienna: Center of Legal Competence.
    9. Filer, K. R. 1995. 'Reforma trhu s byty v České republice: Pokrok a zbývající úkoly' (Reform of the Housing Market in the Czech Republic: Progress and Remaining Tasks). Pp. 23-42 in Liberalizace trhu s byty v České republice. Prague: Aleko.
    10. Ford, J., J. Rugg and R. Burrows. 2002. 'Conceptualising the Contemporary Role of Housing in the Transition to Adult Life in England.' Urban Studies 39: 2455-2467. Go to original source...
    11. Giorgi, L., A. Kofler and D. Avramov. 2001. 'European Housing Policies Compared.' ICCR Working Papers No. 507. Vienna: ICCR.
    12. Haffner, M., M. Elsinga and J. Hoekstra. 2008. 'Rent Regulation: the Balance between Private Landlords and Tenants in Six European Countries.' European Journal of Housing Policy 8: 217-233. Go to original source...
    13. Haffner, M., J. Hoekstra, M. Oxley and H. M. H. van der Heijden. 2009. Bridging the Gap between Social and Market Rental Housing in Six European Countries? Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    14. Hegedüs, J. and I. Tosics. 1998. 'Rent Reform - Issues for Countries of Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States.' Housing Studies 13: 657-658. Go to original source...
    15. Hughes, D. and S. Lowe (eds.). 2002. The Private Rented Sector in a New Century. Bristol: Policy Press. Go to original source...
    16. Hughes, D. and S. Lowe (eds.). 2007. The Private Rented Housing Market. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    17. Kemeny, J. 1981. The Myth of Homeownership. London: Routledge.
    18. Kemeny, J. 1992. Housing and Social Theory. London, New York: Routledge.
    19. Kemeny, J. 1995. From Public Housing to the Social Market. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
    20. Kemp, P. A. (ed.) 2007. Housing Allowances in Comparative Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
    21. Kratoška, J. 1920. Ochrana nájemníků : zabírání bytů, omezení práva stěhovacího. Výklad zákona (Tenant Protection: Occupation of Flats, Restrictions on Mobility Law. Statutory Interpretation). Prague: Ústřední dělnické knihkupectví a nakladatelství.
    22. Lind, H. 2001. 'Rent Regulation: a Conceptual and Comparative Analysis.' European Journal of Housing Policy 1: 41-57. Go to original source...
    23. Lowe, S. and S. Tsenkova (eds.). 2003. Housing Change in East and Central Europe: Integration or Fragmentation? London, New York: Ashgate.
    24. Lundqvist, L. 1992. Dislodging the Welfare State? Housing and Privatisation in Four European Countries. Delft: Delft University Press.
    25. Lux, M. (ed.) 2003. Housing Policy - an End or a New Beginning. Budapest: LGI/OSI.
    26. Lux, M. 2009. Housing Policy and Housing Finance in the Czech Republic during Transition. An Example of Schism between the Still-living Past and the Need of Reform. Amsterdam: Delft University Press.
    27. Lux, M., P. Sunega, M. Mikeszová and T. Kostelecký. 2008. Standardy bydlení 2007/2008. Faktory vysokých cen vlastnického bydlení v Praze (Housing Standards 2007/2008: the Factors behind High House Prices in Prague). Prague: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
    28. Mildschuh, V., R. Dušek and K. Herman. 1931. K naší otázce bytové (On the Czech Housing Question). Prague: Prometheus.
    29. Oxley, M. and J. Smith. 1996. Housing Policy and Rented Housing in Europe. London: Chapman and Hall.
    30. Poláková, O. 2006. 'Historie bydlení a bytové politiky na území České Republiky' (The History of Housing and Housing Policy in the Czech Republic). Pp. 243-263 in Bydlení a bytová politika, edited by O. Poláková. Prague: Ekopress.
    31. Rugg, J. (ed.) 1999. Young People, Housing and Social Policy. London, New York: Routledge.
    32. Rugg, J. and D. Rhodes. 2008. The Private Rented Sector: Its Contribution and Potential. York: Centre for Housing Policy.
    33. Šmídová, O. 1996. 'Vlastnictví a kvazi-vlastnictví bytů za socialismu a jejich postsocialistická mutace' (Ownership and Quasi-ownership under Socialism and Their Post-socialist Mutations). Pp. 115-136 in Původní a noví vlastníci: strategie nabývání majetku ve střední a východní Evropě, edited by A. Olivier and M. Tuček. Prague: CEFRES.
    34. Struyk, R. (ed.) 1996. Economic Restructuring of the Former Soviet Block: the Case of Housing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
    35. Sýkora, L. and I. Šimoníčková. 1994. 'From Totalitarian Urban Managerialism to a Liberalized Real Estate Market: Prague's Transformations in the Early 1990s.' Pp. 47-72 in Development and Administration of Prague, edited by M. Barlow, P. Dostál and M. Hampl. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content