Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2012, 48(5): 965-988 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2012.48.5.07

Czech Housing Estates: Factors of Stability and Future Development

Ondřej Špaček
Fakulta sociálních věd a Fakulta humanitních studií UK, Praha

Housing estates are one of the most important legacies of the socialist regime and continue to infl uence the shape of Czech towns even today. Despite pessimistic predictions about their future in the early 1990s, they are still a widespread and valued type of housing. This article, unlike other primarily economically oriented studies, analyses the situation and possible future development of Czech housing states by combining three theoretical perspectives from urban sociology: social ecology, the political economy of place, and a culturalist perspective. A contributing factor to the stable situation of housing estates is the ambivalent relationship that exists towards this type of construction, which ultimately never became convincingly stigmatised. Many of the inhabitants of such estates have moreover established fi rm roots in there and their interest in their place of residence is often sustained by a proprietarial relationship towards the fl at they live in. However, some important factors that could cause this to change in the future include the concentration of ethnic minorities in some locations and the risk of the collapse of collective negotiation among occupant-owners. A deep, empirically grounded prognosis of the future of Czech housing estates requires systematic research focused on a specific location and designed to capture the overlooked political-economic and cultural dimensions of this issue.

Published: October 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Špaček, O. (2012). Czech Housing Estates: Factors of Stability and Future Development. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review48(5), 965-988. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2012.48.5.07
Download citation

References

  1. AUGUR Consulting. 2011. Dlouhodobý výzkum brněnských sídlišť 2011. Brno: AUGUR Consulting.
  2. Barvíková, Jana. 2011. Sídliště dnes: Jižní město jako místo k životu z pohledu dvou generací jeho prvních obyvatel. Disertační práce. Praha: Katedra sociologie FSV UK (rukopis).
  3. Bazac-Billaud, Laurent. 1996. "Sociální dopad privatizace bytů na sídlištích: příklad Prahy 13." Pp. 138-144 in Anne Olivier (ed.). Původní a noví vlastníci. Cahiers du CEFRES no 11. Praha: Francouzský ústav pro výzkum ve společenských vědách.
  4. Bazac-Billaud, Laurent. 2000. "Jihozápadní město, Praha 13, Lužiny: několik zamyšlení nad zásadní otázkou pojmenování nevyhraněného prostoru." Pp. 51-72 in Laurent Bazac-Billaud, Zdeněk Uherek (eds.). Slova města. Cahiers du CEFRES no 18. Praha: CEFRES.
  5. van Beckhoven, Ellen, Gideon Bolt, Ronald van Kempen. 2005. "Theories of Neighbourhood Change and Neighbourhood Decline: Their Significance for Post-WWII Large Housing Estates." Příspěvek přednesený na konferenci Housing in Europe: New Challenges and Innovations in Tomorrow's Cities. Reykjavik, 29. 6. - 2. 7. 2005.
  6. van Beckhoven, Ellen, Gideon Bolt, Ronald van Kempen. 2009. "Theories of Neighbourhood Change and Decline: Their Significance for Post-WWII Large Housing Estates in European Cities." Pp. 20-50 in Ronald van Kempen, Sako Musterd, Robert Rowlands (eds.). Mass Housing in Europe: Multiple Faces of Development, Change and Response. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  7. Blažek, Bohuslav. 1998. Venkov, města, média. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  8. Borer, Michael I. 2006. "The Location of Culture: The Urban Culturalist Perspective." City & Community 5 (2): 173-197. Go to original source...
  9. Burgess, Ernest W. 1925. "The Growth of the City: An Introduction to a Research Project." Pp. 47-62 in Robert E. Park, Ernest W. Burgess, Roderick D. McKenzie (eds.). The City. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  10. Czepczyński, Mariusz. 2008. Cultural Landscapes of Post-Socialist Cities: Representation of Powers and Needs. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  11. ČSÚ. 2003. Sčítání lidu, domů a bytů k 1. 3. 2001 - obyvatelstvo, byty, domy a domácnosti. Praha: Český statistický úřad.
  12. Dear, Michael, Steven Flusty. 1998. "Postmodern Urbanism." Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88 (1): 50-72. Go to original source...
  13. Dekker, Karien, Ronald van Kempen. 2004. "Large Housing Estates in Europe: Current Situation and Developments." Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 95 (5): 570-577. Go to original source...
  14. Firey, Walter. 1945. "Sentiment and Symbolism as Ecological Variables." American Sociological Review 10 (2): 140-148. Go to original source...
  15. Flanagan, William G. 2010. Urban Sociology: Images and Structure. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  16. Gans, Herbert J. 2002. "The Sociology of Space: A Use-Centered View." City & Community 1 (4): 329-339. Go to original source...
  17. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  18. Guest, Avery M., Jane K. Cover, Ross L. Matsueda, Charis E. Kubrin. 2006. "Neighborhood Context and Neighboring Ties." City & Community 5 (4): 363-385. Go to original source...
  19. Hall, Stephen, Rob Rowlands. 2005. "Place Making and Large Estates: Theory and Practice." Pp. 47-62 in Ronald van Kempen, Karien Dekker, Stephen Hall, Iván Tosics (eds.). Restructuring Large Housing Estates in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press. Go to original source...
  20. Hammel, D. J. 2009. "Gentrification." Pp. 360-367 in Rob Kitchin, Nigel Thrift (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Go to original source...
  21. Hrůza, Jiří. 2002. Charty moderního urbanismu. Praha: Agora.
  22. Hubatová-Vacková, Lada, Cyril Říha (eds.). 2007. Husákovo 3 + 1: bytová kultura 70. let. Praha: VŠUP.
  23. Chludilová, Iva. 2003. "Cizinci v České republice." Naše společnost 1 (1-2): 13-18.
  24. Kährik, Anneli, Tiit Tammaru. 2010. "Soviet Prefabricated Panel Housing Estates: Areas of Continued Social Mix or Decline? The Case of Tallinn." Housing Studies 25 (2): 201-219. Go to original source...
  25. van Kempen, Ronald, Karien Dekker, Stephen Hall, Iván Tosics (eds.). 2005. Restructuring Large Housing Estates in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  26. van Kempen, Ronald, Sako Musterd, Robert Rowlands (eds.). 2009. Mass Housing in Europe: Multiple Faces of Development, Change and Response. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Kidder, Jeffrey. 2009. "Appropriating the City: Space, Theory, and Bike Messengers." Theory and Society 38 (3): 307-328. Go to original source...
  28. Kulcsar, Laszlo J., Tamas Domokos. 2005. "The Post-Socialist Growth Machine: The Case of Hungary." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (3): 550-563. Go to original source...
  29. Logan, John R., Harvey L. Molotch. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  30. Löw, Martina. 2009. "The Intrinsic Logic of Cities." Pp. I03:1-I03:5 in Daniel Koch, Lars Marcus, Jesper Steen (eds.). Proceedings: Seventh International Space Syntax Symposium. Stockholm: KTH.
  31. Lux, Martin, Petr Sunega, Tomáš Kostelecký, Daniel Čermák, Josef Montag. 2005. Standardy bydlení 2004/05: Financování bydlení a regenerace sídlišť. Praha: SOÚ AV ČR.
  32. Maier, Karel. 2001. "Citizen Participation in Planning: Climbing a Ladder?" European Planning Studies 9 (6): 707-719. Go to original source...
  33. Maier, Karel. 2003. "Sídliště: problém a multikriteriální analýza jako součást přípravy k jeho řešení." Sociologický časopis 39 (5): 653-666. Go to original source...
  34. Maier, Karel. 2004. "Udržitelná regenerace sídlišť." Urbanismus a územní rozvoj 7 (4): 16-24.
  35. Murie, Alan, Thomas Knorr-Siedow, Ronald van Kempen. 2003. Large Housing Estates in Europe: General Developments and Theoretical Backgrounds. Utrecht: Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University.
  36. Murie, Alan, Iván Tosics, Manuel Aalbers, Richard Sendi, Barbara Černič Mali. 2005. "Privatisation and after." Pp. 85-103 in Ronald van Kempen, Karien Dekker, Stephen Hall, Iván Tosics (eds.). Restructuring Large Housing Estates in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press. Go to original source...
  37. Musil, Jiří et al. 1985. Lidé a sídliště. Praha: Svoboda.
  38. Musil, Jiří. 1991. "Nové vymezení sociální ekologie." Sociologický časopis 27 (1): 69-89.
  39. Musil, Jiří. 2003. "Proměny urbánní sociologie ve Spojených státech a Evropě 1950-2000." Sociologický časopis 39 (2): 137-167. Go to original source...
  40. Musil, Jiří. 2002. "Urbanizace českých zemí a socialismus." Pp. 237-297 in Pavla Horská, Eduard Maur, Jiří Musil. Zrod velkoměsta: Urbanizace českých zemí a Evropa. Praha: Paseka.
  41. Musil, Jiří. 2004. "Současná pojetí sociální soudržnosti a Česká republika." Pp. 7-16 in Jiří Musil (ed.). Pojetí sociální soudržnosti v soudobé sociologii a politologii. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, CESES.
  42. Musterd, Sako, Ronald van Kempen, Rob Rowlands. 2009. "Mass Housing Estates on Different Tracks: An Introduction to the Book." Pp. 1-19 in Ronald van Kempen, Sako Musterd, Robert Rowlands (eds.). Mass Housing in Europe: Multiple Faces of Development, Change and Response. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  43. Novotná, Barbora. 2010. "Panelák jako symbol a místo paměti." Sociální studia 7 (3): 127-131.
  44. Park, Robert E. 1925. "The City: Suggestions for the Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment." Pp. 1-46 in Robert E. Park, Ernest W. Burgess, Roderick D. McKenzie (eds.). The City. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  45. Relph, E. 1976. Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
  46. Sailer-Fliege, Ulrike. 1999. "Characteristics of Post-socialist Urban Transformation in East Central Europe." GeoJournal 49 (1): 7-16. Go to original source...
  47. Saunders, Peter. 1986. Social Theory and the Urban Question. London: Routledge.
  48. Saunders, Peter. 2001. "Urban Ecology." Pp. 36-51 in Ronan Paddison (ed.). Handbook of Urban Studies. London: SAGE Publications. Go to original source...
  49. Savage, Mike, Alan Warde. 1993. Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity. London: The Macmillan Press. Go to original source...
  50. Stanilov, Kiril. 2007. "Housing Trends in Central and Eastern European Cities during and after the Period of Transition." Pp. 173-190 in Kiril Stanilov (ed.). The Post-Socialist City. Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism. Dordrecht: Springer. Go to original source...
  51. Steinführer, Annett. 2003. "Sociálně prostorové struktury mezi setrvalostí a změnou. Historický a současný pohled na Brno." Sociologický časopis 39 (2): 169-192. Go to original source...
  52. Steinführer, Annett. 2006. "The Urban Transition of Inner City Areas Reconsidered (A German-Czech Comparision)." Moravian Geographical Reports 14 (1): 3-16.
  53. Sunega, Petr, Tomáš Kostelecký. 2007. "Prostředí sídlišť v ČR a v zahraničí: vybrané aspekty sociální udržitelnosti." Příspěvek přednesený na konferenci URBES 2007. Masarykova kolej ČVUT, Praha, 27.-28. 11. 2007.
  54. Sunega, Petr, Martin Lux. 2004. "Participace nájemníků a sociální aspekty regenerace panelových sídlišť jako jedna z podmínek trvale udržitelného rozvoje." Urbanismus a územní rozvoj 7 (3): 5-9.
  55. Suttles, Gerald. 1984. "The Cumulative Texture of Local Urban Culture." The American Journal of Sociology 90 (2): 283-304. Go to original source...
  56. SÚRM. 2001. Analýza regenerace pražských panelových sídlišť. Praha: Magistrát hl. m. Prahy - Sekce Útvar rozvoje města.
  57. Sýkora, Luděk. 1993. "Teoretické přístupy ke studiu města." Pp. 64-99 in Luděk Sýkora (ed.). Teoretické přístupy a vybrané problémy v současné geografii. Praha: Katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje, Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Karlovy.
  58. Sýkora, Luděk. 2009. "Post-Socialist Cities." Pp. 387-395 in Rob Kitchin, Nigel Thrift (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Go to original source...
  59. Szelenyi, Ivan. 1996. "Cities under Socialism - and After." Pp. 286-317 in Gregory Andrusz, Michael Harloe, Ivan Szelenyi (eds.). Cities After Socialism. Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Go to original source...
  60. Šmídová, Olga. 1996. "Vlastnictví a kvazi-vlastnictví bytů za socialismu a jejich postsocialistická mutace." Pp. 115-136 in Anne Olivier (ed.). Původní a noví vlastníci. Cahiers du CEFRES no 11. Praha: CEFRES.
  61. Šustrová, Klára. 2008. Vnitroměstská migrace v Praze v letech 1992-2006. Diplomová práce. Praha: Katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje PřF UK (rukopis).
  62. Temelová, Jana, Jakub Novák, Martin Ouředníček, Petra Puldová. 2011. "Housing Estates in the Czech Republic after Socialism: Various Trajectories and Inner Differentiation." Urban Studies 48 (9): 1811-1834. Go to original source...
  63. Tonkiss, Fran. 2005. Space, the City and Social Theory: Social Relations and Urban Forms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  64. Tosics, Iván. 2004. "European Urban Development: Sustainability and the Role of Housing." Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19 (1): 67-90. Go to original source...
  65. Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1977. Space and Place. The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  66. Unger, Donald, Abraham Wandersman. 1985. "The Importance of Neighbors: The Social, Cognitive, and Affective Components of Neighboring." American Journal of Community Psychology 13 (2): 139-169. Go to original source...
  67. Vandenbrande, Tom (ed.). 2006. Mobility in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  68. Wiest, Karin. 2011. "Large-Scale Housing Estates in Central and East European Cities: Between Residential Preferences and Local Housing Market Differences." Housing, Theory and Society 28 (4): 410-431. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.