Sociologický časopis 1995, 31(2):215-239 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.1995.31.2.13

From Equality to Equity? The Czech Republic Between Two Ideologies of Distributive Justice

Petr Matějů, Klára Vlachová
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, Praha

Published: April 1, 1995  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Matějů, P., & Vlachová, K. (1995). From Equality to Equity? The Czech Republic Between Two Ideologies of Distributive Justice. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review31(2), 215-239. doi: 10.13060/00380288.1995.31.2.13
Download citation

References

  1. Abercrombie, N., S. Hill, B. S. Turner 1980. The Dominant Ideology Thesis. London: Allen and Unwin.
  2. Bakker, B. F. M., J. Dronkers, G. W. Meijnen (ed.) 1989. Educational Opportunities in the Welfare State. Nijmegen: Institute for Applied Social Sciences.
  3. Benáček, V. 1993. Toil and Trouble of an Indigenous Enterpreneur during Transition. The case of Czech Republic. CERGE.
  4. Berger, J., M. Zelditch, Jr., B. Anderson, B. Cohen 1972. "Structural Aspects of Distributive Justice: A Status Value Formulation." Pp. 119-146 in Sociological Theories in Progress, ed. by J. Berger, M. Zelditch, B. Anderson. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
  5. Byrne, B. 1989. A Primer of LISREL. New York: Springer Verlag. Go to original source...
  6. Dahrendorf, R. 1979. Life Chances. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Dahrendorf, R. 1991. Reflections on the Revolutions in Europe. London: Chatto Windus.
  8. Della Fave, L. R. 1980. "The Meek Shall Not Inherit the Earth." American Sociological Review 45: 955-71. Go to original source...
  9. Della Fave, L. R. 1986a. "The Dialectics of Legitimation and Counternorms." Sociological Perspectives 29: 435-60. Go to original source...
  10. Della Fave, L. R. 1986b. "Toward an Explication of the Legitimation Process." Social Forces 65: 476-500. Go to original source...
  11. Deutsch, M. 1975. "Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used As the Basis of Distributive Justice?" Journal of Social Issues 31: 137-49. Go to original source...
  12. Domański, H., B. Heyns 1992. "Toward a Modified Theory of Market Transition: From Bargain to Market Control in State Socialism." Warsaw. (manuscript).
  13. Habermas, J. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Beacon Press. Go to original source...
  14. Halle, D. 1984. America's Working Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  15. Hochschild, J. L. 1981. What's Fair? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  16. Huber, J., W. H. Form 1973. Income and Ideology. New York: Free Press.
  17. Jansen, W., J. Dronkers, K. Verrips (ed.) 1989. Similar or Different? Nijmegen: Institute for Applied Social Sciences.
  18. Jöreskog, K. G., D. Sörbom 1986. PRELIS. A Preprocessor to Lisrel. First Edition. Chicago: SPSS inc.
  19. Jöreskog, K. G., D. Sörbom 1988. LISREL 7. A Guide to the Program and Applications. 2nd Edition. Chicago: SPSS inc.
  20. Klíma, A. 1961. Čechy v období temna. Praha: SPN.
  21. Kluegel, J. R. 1985. "The bases of contemporary affirmative action attitudes: If there isn't a problem, you don't need a solution." American Behavioral Scientist 28: 761-784. Go to original source...
  22. Kluegel, J. R. 1986. "Economic problems and socioeconomic beliefs and attitudes." Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 7: 273-302.
  23. Kluegel, J. R., E. R. Smith 1981. "Beliefs about Stratification." Annual Review of Sociology 7: 29-56. Go to original source...
  24. Kluegel, J. R., E. R. Smith 1986. Beliefs about Inequality. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  25. Lane, R. E. 1962. Political Ideology. New York: Free Press.
  26. Lerner, M. J. 1980. The Belief in a Just World. New York: Plenum. Go to original source...
  27. Malý, K., F.Sivák 1988. Dějiny státu a práva v Československu I. Praha: Panorama.
  28. Mann, M. 1970. "The social cohesion of liberal democracy." American Sociological Review 5: 423-439. Go to original source...
  29. Mann, M. 1973. Consciousness and Action Among the Western Working Class. London: Macmillan. Go to original source...
  30. Matějů, P. 1992. "From Unjust Equality to Just Inequality? The Perception of Changing Inequality in Czechoslovakia." Working Papers of the International Survey on Social Justice, Butler University.
  31. Matějů, P. 1993. "Determinanty ekonomického úspěchu v první fázi postkomunistické transformace. Česká republika 1989-1992." Sociologický časopis 29: 341-366
  32. Matějů, P., J. Kluegel 1993. "Principles of Distributive Justice in Comparative Perspective." Working Papers 93: 6. Institute of Sociology ASCR.
  33. Matějů, P., J. Peschar 1990. "Family Background and Educational Attainment in Czechoslovakia and the Netherlands." Pp. 121-145 in Class Structure in Europe. New Findings from East-West Comparisons of Social Structure and Mobility, ed. by M. Haller. New York: Sharpe. Go to original source...
  34. Matějů, P., B. Řeháková 1992. "Od nespravedlivé rovnosti ke spravedlivé nerovnosti? Percepce sociálních nerovností a sociální spravedlnosti v současném Československu." Sociologický časopis 28: 293-318.
  35. Matějů, P., B. Řeháková 1993. "Revolution for Whom? Analysis of Selected Patterns of Intragenerational Mobility in the Czech Republic, 1989-1992." Czech Sociological Review 1: 73-90.
  36. Offe, C. 1991. "Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe." Social Research 58: 865-892.
  37. Parkin, F. 1971. Class, Inequality and Political Order. New York: Praeger.
  38. Parsons, T. 1954. "A Revised Analytical Approach to the Theory of Stratification". Pp. 212-237 in Essays in Sociological Theory (revised edition). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  39. Pekař, J. 1990. O smyslu českých dějin. Praha: Rozmluvy.
  40. Peschar, J. (ed.) 1990. Social Reproduction in Eastern and Western Europe. Comparative Analyses on Czechoslovakia, Hungary, the Netherlands and Poland. Nijmegen: Institute for Applied Social Sciences.
  41. Ritzman, R. L., D. Tomaskovic-Devey 1992. "Life Chances and Support for Equality and Equity As Normative and Counternormative Distribution Rules." Social Forces 70: 745-763. Go to original source...
  42. Robinson, R. V., W. Bell 1978. "Equality, success and social justice in England and United States." American Sociological Review 43: 125-143. Go to original source...
  43. Sennett, R., J. Cobb 1972. The Hidden Injuries of Class. New York: Vintage.
  44. Shepelak, N. 1987. "The Role of Self-explanation and Self-evaluation in Legitimating Inequality." American Sociological Review 52: 495-503. Go to original source...
  45. Shepelak, N., D. Alwin 1986. "Beliefs about Inequality and Perceptions of Distributive Justice." American Sociological Review 51: 30-46. Go to original source...
  46. Sztompka, P. 1992. "Dilemmas of the Great Transition." Sisyphus Social Studies 2 (VIII): 9-28.
  47. Večerník, J. 1992. "Změny v příjmové nerovnosti v letech 1988-1992." Sociologický časopis 26: 666-684.
  48. Walster, E., G. W. Walster 1975. "Equity and Social Justice." Journal of Social Issues 31: 21-43. Go to original source...
  49. Wegener, B., S. Liebig 1992. "Dominant Ideologies and the Variation of Justice Norms: A Comparison of East Germany, West Germany, and the United States." Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Pittsburgh, August.
  50. Wesołowski, W., E. Wnuk-Lipiński 1992. "Transformation of Social Order and Legitimization of Inequalities." Pp. 83-95 in Escape from Socialism. The Polish Route. Ed. by W. Connor and P. Ploszajski, Warsaw. Go to original source...
  51. Wheaton, B., B. Muthen, D. F. Alwin, G. F. Summers 1977. "Assessing reliability and stability in panel models". Pp. 84-136 in Sociological Methodology, ed. by R. D. Heise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.